If you’re a current subscriber, log in below. If you would like to subscribe, please click the subscribe tab above.
Username and Password Help
Please enter your email and we will send your username and password to you.
American Heart Association News
Women who develop heart failure following certain breast cancer treatments are generally healthier and have a better prognosis than those with heart failure from other causes, a new study finds.
Two widely used treatments for breast cancer are known to harm the heart. A class of chemotherapy drugs called anthracyclines interferes with cancer cells’ DNA and ability to multiply. The monoclonal antibody trastuzumab blocks the protein that allows HER2-postive breast cancer to spread aggressively. It often is pre- scribed with chemotherapy. Roughly 1 in 5 breast cancer cases are HER2- positive.
Many doctors and patients assume heart failure after breast cancer treatment is like any other case, without looking closely at the nature of the disease, said Dr. Husam
Abdel-Qadir, a cardiologist at Women’s College Hospital at the University of Toronto.
“There was an unspoken assump- tion that this is just like heart failure from other causes, such as after a heart attack, in which the prognosis can be quite bad – even though we did not have any data for it,” he said. “So, we tried to fill that gap.”
The researchers analyzed data between 2007 and 2017 of people in Ontario, Canada, where universal health care is available to all resi- dents. They compared two groups of women with heart failure. Those who had been treated for early-stage breast cancer were less likely to have other health problems, such as atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure or diabetes, compared to a control group without a history of cancer.
Also, the women treated for breast cancer were less likely than those without it to be hospitalized or visit the emergency room for their heart
failure over an eight-year period. The type of cancer medication
women received mattered. The rate of visiting or being admitted to the hos- pital for women taking anthracy- clines was about the same as the control group. But the rate for women taking trastuzumab with or without anthracyclines was lower. (Unlike women taking only anthracy- clines, those taking trastuzumab are required to have an echocardiogram every three months to look for signs of heart problems, which may partly account for the lower incidence of heart failure requiring hospital care in this group.)
Women in the cancer group also were less likely to die of cardiovascu- lar causes during a median follow-up of three and a half years – 2.2% died from cardiovascular disease com- pared to 5.1% in the control group.
The findings appeared Wednesday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation: Heart Failure.
Dr. Susan Faye Dent, a medical oncologist at Duke Cancer Center in Durham, North Carolina, said the risk of developing heart failure from anthracyclines or trastuzumab is fairly low overall.
Up to 4% of people taking trastuzumab with chemotherapy may experience heart failure, according to a 2018 report about cardiovascular disease and breast cancer from the American Heart Association – although Dent, who co-authored the report, said higher rates have been reported in various studies. The risk of heart failure from anthracyclines depends on the cumulative dose received, with lower doses associated with a 5% risk of heart failure.
“The risk of dying of cancer is probably still much higher if patients do not get appropriate cancer treat- ment, compared to the risk of them dying of cardiovascular disease,” said Dent, who was not involved with the new study.