Rethinking methane: Animal ag viewed as part of climate solution
If you’re a current subscriber, log in below. If you would like to subscribe, please click the subscribe tab above.
Username and Password Help
Animal agriculture and meat consumption aren’t near the threat to climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as often portrayed.
In fact, the highly publicized and often criticized gas emitted by animal ag, methane, possesses qualities that could help lead the way to climate neutrality, according to Frank Mitloehner, professor and air quality specialist in the department of animal sciences at the University of California-Davis.
“I think there are some issues around climate change not accurately portrayed,” Mitloehner said. “Many feel methane is the Achilles’ heel of animal ag. We’re about to change the narrative.”
Mitloehner discussed the subject in early June in an address aimed at “Rethinking Methane” during the World Pork Expo in Des Moines.
A key point to the professor’s analysis centers on atmospheric removal of methane through a chem- ical reaction called oxidation.
While roughly 560 teragrams (trillion grams) of methane enter the atmosphere annually, the majority, 550 teragrams, are removed via natural processes.
Meanwhile, methane has a relatively short lifespan (10 years) compared to 110 years for nitrous oxide and 1,000 years for carbon dioxide. All three greenhouse gases store solar heat when in the atmosphere.
“Methane is different than other greenhouse gases,” Mitloehner said. “It’s not only produced, but it’s naturally destroyed. This is a fact that’s often ignored.
“I’m not saying methane isn’t a problem,” he continued. “But, it has an atmospheric removal process you need to be aware of.”
Methane is known as a flow gas due to the fact it’s destroyed in the atmosphere at the same rate of emission. Carbon dioxide, by comparison, is a stock gas, meaning every time a person burns fossil fuel it remains in the atmosphere for a long period of time.
The professor also noted methane is produced through the atmosphere and via photosynthesis of plants. So, when livestock consume plants, do they technically emit new additional carbon into the atmosphere?
“They’re not producing new carbon,” Mitloehner said. “It’s recycled carbon (from plants) that was in the atmosphere in the form of CO2 (carbon diox- ide).
“All the climate agreements want to keep warming from increasing,” he noted. “If an industry keeps warming constant, it would satisfy the Paris Climate Accord. In fact, we’re doing that today (in animal ag).”
Looking ahead, methane can actually help counter the effect of other GHGs.
“We should work on techniques and technologies to further reduce methane,” Mitloehner said. “It will lessen the effect of other gases and help lead to climate neutrality.”
California implemented aggressive emissions reduction strategies on farms and reduced GHG emissions by 2.2 million tons in the dairy sector since 2015, according to the air quality specialist.
The hog industry continues on a similar path of success as it doubled pork production in the U.S. in the past 50 years while using 76% less land, 25% less water and 7% less energy, according to Jen Sorenson, president of the National Pork Producers Council.
“U.S. pork producers have a great story to tell,” she said. “And we’re not done. We support incen- tives to further reduce emissions.”
The pork industry lowered its carbon footprint by 7.7% in recent decades and, as of 2019, account- ed for just 0.4% of total GHG emissions.
To learn more about Mitloehner’s research on climate change and the role of animal ag, search and watch his videos on YouTube “Rethinking Methane” and “Eating Less Meat Won’t Save the Planet. Here’s Why.”
This story was distributed through a cooperative project between Illinois Farm Bureau and the Illinois Press Association.